Analyze the substantive differences between a vocational rehabilitation clinician and a standard mental health clinician, include treatment ideology for both.

 
In 1,000 words, consider the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California to answer the following:

  1. Discuss why the case is important to mental health clinicians.
  2. Describe the violence risk assessment instruments a clinician might use to meet the requirements provided for in Tarasoff.
  3. Discuss if a clinician should be held civilly liable for violent behavior of an inmate the clinician assessed.

Provide three to five peer reviewed resources to support your explanations.
In 750-1,000 words, do the following:

  1. Analyze the substantive differences between a vocational rehabilitation clinician and a standard mental health clinician, include treatment ideology for both.
  2. Describe ethical challenges to treatment that might be encountered by a vocational rehabilitation clinician in a correctional facility. Explain how those ethical challenges can be addressed.

Provide a minimum of three to five peer reviewed resources to support your explanations.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.