Review a minimum of 30 credible sources that were published within the last five years.

Question descriptionThis tasks is the addition to my last paper. The one on the nurse orientation program. I have attached a sample outline on how to complete the task along with the 1st paper that was written if you need it.
Task 2: Introduction and Literature Review
Introduction:
The Field Experience course represents a significant milestone toward completion of your MSN degree. This assessment will be the final task of the MSN Field Experience. For this assessment, you will create an introduction and literature review, which will make up the first two chapters of your written capstone document. Upon successful completion of this task, you will move to the capstone course, where you will fully implement and complete your capstone project. Chapters one and two of your capstone project will not be evaluated again in the capstone course but must be included in the final capstone document.
Chapter 1: Introduction
A. Provide an introduction (suggested length of 4–6 pages) that explains the rationale for your project by doing the following:
1. Explain the background of the problem.
2. Provide your problem statement.
3. Summarize the scope of the project by doing the following:
a. Describe the practice change, quality improvement, or innovation.
b. Provide a rationale for the practice change, quality improvement, or innovation.
Chapter 2: Literature Review
B. Provide a thorough and well-organized literature review on your topic by doing the following:
1. Review a minimum of 30 credible sources that were published within the last five years.
Note: In order to prove that you have reviewed 30 credible sources, you will need to provide a list, in APA format, of the sources you reviewed for part B1.

2. Identify best practices for your topic based on the review of literature.
3. Provide an evidence summary of the literature relevant to the topic you have chosen.
C. Recommend a practice change, quality improvement, or innovation based on the findings of the literature review and evidence summary from parts A and B.
D. When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Final Chapters of Capstone Report

Question description

Please use the paper I have below to add to the report.

Task 1: Final Chapters of Capstone Report

Introduction:

In this task, you will create the remaining chapters of your final capstone written report. Chapters 1 and 2 were created and evaluated as part of your field experience. In this task, you will create chapters 3, 4, and 5, as well as an abstract for your entire report.

Your report should include the following items in the following order: the abstract you will write at the end of this task; a table of contents; chapters 1 and 2, which you wrote for task 2 of the field experience; and chapters 3, 4, and 5, which will be written as part of this task. Chapters 1 and 2 will not be reevaluated, but they will need to be submitted as part of the completed capstone report.

Chapter 3: Implementation

Project Launch

A. Evaluate how you implemented your capstone project by doing the following:

1. Describe the actual steps taken to implement your capstone project.

2. Discuss any changes that occurred to the original implementation plan during this process.

3. Discuss any barriers associated with the implementation of your capstone project.

a. Explain how you overcame the barriers discussed in part A3.

Collaboration

B. Identify interprofessional relationships that promoted implementation of your capstone project.

1. Discuss how the relationships identified in part B facilitated the implementation of your project.

Chapter 4: Postcapstone Project Considerations

Evaluation

C. Discuss the most successful aspects of your capstone project.

1. Explain how the successes of your project can help to inform future projects.

D. Discuss aspects of your project that did not go as well as anticipated.

1. Explain how understanding of what did not go well can help to inform future projects.

E. Explain how your capstone project bridged the gap between evidence and current practice.

Organizational Sustainability

F. Discuss the organization’s plan to support the postimplementation of the capstone project, including plans for short- and long-term maintenance.

G. Discuss the resources needed for postimplementation support.

Chapter 5: Reflection

H. Discuss how you integrated two MSN program outcomes into your capstone project.

I. Submit your completed capstone report, including the abstract and chapters 1–5.

Abstract

J. Create an abstract for your capstone project, including:

• problem identification

• plan for addressing the problem under investigation

• implementation process

 

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Describes the circumstances around the development of the existing initiative

HCM 340 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric Overview: In Module Four, you examined some of the recent initiatives aimed at improving the performance of the healthcare system. As you learned in your module readings, healthcare should be safe, effective, timely, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered. These six key dimensions form the basis for all quality and payment reform strategies implemented since the release of healthcare improvement plans. Prompt: In this milestone, you will identify and analyze an initiative that addresses the gap you chose as the topic for your final project. Explain what the initiative is, identify the goals of the initiative, describe the circumstances around its development, and identify sources of funding. Tip: So far in the course, you have been introduced to the Kaiser Family Foundation and Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) websites. These websites may also be helpful to you as you conduct your research on an existing initiative. Your milestone should address each of the following points in detail:
• Explain an existing healthcare initiative that was put in place to address this gap in access. • Explain the specific goals of the existing initiative in place to address this gap in access. • Describe the circumstances around the development of the existing initiative. Consider when the initiative was developed and what factors were
considered. • Describe the resources required to fund the existing initiative. • Explain why the existing initiative is not meeting its intended purpose and now requires improvement.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value Existing Initiative: Address
Gap Explains an existing healthcare initiative that was put in place to address this gap in access
Explains an existing healthcare initiative that was put in place to address this gap in access, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies
Does not explain an existing healthcare initiative that was put in place to address this gap in access
18
Existing Initiative: Goals Explains the specific goals of the existing initiative in place to address this gap in access
Explains the specific goals of the existing initiative in place to address this gap in access, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies
Does not explain the specific goals of the existing initiative in place to address this gap in access
18
Existing Initiative: Development
Describes the circumstances around the development of the existing initiative
Describes the circumstances around the development of the existing initiative, but description is unclear or incomplete
Does not describe the circumstances around the development of the existing initiative
18
Existing Initiative: Resources Describes the resources required to fund the existing initiative
Describes the resources required to fund the existing initiative, but description is illogical or contains inaccuracies
Does not describe the resources required to fund the existing initiative
18
Existing Initiative: Improvement
Explains why the existing initiative is not meeting its intended purpose and now requires improvement
Explains why the existing initiative is not meeting its intended purpose and now requires improvement, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies
Does not explain why the existing initiative is not meeting its intended purpose and now requires improvement
18
Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
10
Total 100%
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

dentify proper research literature is primary to developing your end of program capstone project. Tasks:

Being able to identify proper research literature is primary to developing your end of program capstone project.
Tasks:
Access Argosy’s electronic library databases and conduct a search for nursing research literature that is relevant to your anticipated capstone focus. Develop an annotated bibliography of this literature and identify two research articles, one qualitative and one quantitative, that are specific to your capstone focus.
The annotated bibliography should consist of no fewer than 10 research articles and should broadly represent the literature available that is related to your capstone focus.
Select one article that is a report of qualitative nursing research and one article that is a report of quantitative nursing research.
Analyze and state the differences between the two chosen articles using the listed components on the Research Article Analysis form provided (i.e., problem statement, purpose, research objectives).
Your final product should include the annotated bibliography, a completed Research Article Analysis Form, and a narrative (1–2 pages) in which you differentiate between the two types of research and explain the importance of both types in evidence-based nursing practice.
Note: For the annotative bibliography, the 10 articles need to be listed in alphabetical order and all key ideas need to be summarized and evaluated. Articles used for the Research Article Analysis Form should be clearly identified using APA format and including the database source.
Support your findings with examples and scholarly references. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Disaster planning/preparedness in a health care setting

TOPIC: Disaster planning/preparedness in a health care setting

  1. Introduction (120 words)
  2. Objectives: Three objectives      you intend to address in the proposed risk management educational session.      (70 words)
  3. Rationale: Rationale for each      objective (i.e., Why are these three objectives key or core to the risk      management issue?). (70 words)
  4. Supportive Data: Data to support the need for the proposed educational session (150 words).
  5. Implementation Strategies: How will you implement the proposed educational session? (150 words).
  6. Evaluation Strategies: What tools will you use to evaluate the proposed educational session? (70 words)
  7. Challenges and Opportunities: Ideas or suggestions about areas of focus regarding risk management the      organization could or should address moving forward into the future? (70 words)

Total of 700 words. APA format is required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.
MINIMUM OF 3 REFERENCES, CHECK PLAGIARISM PLEASE. I WILL SUBMIT IN TURNITIN. PLEASE FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Educational and Community-Based Programs" page of the Healthy People 2020 website.

Question description
identify a specific evidence-based practice proposal topic for the capstone project. Consider the clinical environment in which you are currently working or have recently worked. The capstone project topic can be a clinical practice problem, an organizational issue, a quality improvement suggestion, a leadership initiative, or an educational need appropriate to your area of interest as well as your practice immersion (practicum) setting. Examples of the integration of community health, leadership, and an EBP can be found on the”Educational and Community-Based Programs” page of the Healthy People 2020 website.
Write a 500-750 word description of your proposed capstone project topic. Make sure to include the following:

  1. The problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need that will be the focus of the project
  2. The setting or context in which the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need can be observed.
  3. A description providing a high level of detail regarding the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need.
  4. Impact of the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need on the work environment, the quality of care provided by staff, and patient outcomes.
  5. Significance of the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need and its implications to nursing.
  6. A proposed solution to the identified project topic

You are required to retrieve and assess a minimum of 8 peer-reviewed articles.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

How well do you know your future role in advance practice?

 

How well do you know your future role in advance practice?
The elevator door opens; you step on and find yourself face to face with a known skeptical colleague, who inquires “what are you doing in your profession”? It’s your chance to share, define and possible persuade this person about your chosen role of nursing in advance practice. You have 10 floors, roughly 90 seconds to make an impression. Draft an “Elevator Speech” (approximately 300 words) reflecting the conversation about your future role in your program of study.  In three detailed paragraphs, address why you have chosen this role (your passion) and define steps to ascertain the role including certification criteria and how the role will impact patient outcomes (how you will make a difference).
Support your work with evidence based research. For example, in conversation you tell the person A recent study by Taylor in 2016 showed that NPs were efficient as MDs at treating primary care problems. (Reference at the end) Respond to at least two of your cohorts, faculty and continue the dialogue with those that responded to your initial post. Use references in your responses.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Nursing problem

Evidence Based Nursing Project
Fall 2018
Group members:
Be sure to list the names of those who participated in the project.
1
Knowledge Discovery
Do not add anything to this slide.
2
Nursing problem
Desired outcome
4
Background questions with answers
May need to put answers here
5
Background questions with answers (con’t)
May need to put answers here
6
PICOT question
P- Patients in the acute care setting
I- Hourly rounding
C- No hourly rounds
O- Preventing or decreasing falls
Keywords used for literature search
Databases used for literature search
Search strategy to find systematic reviews
10
Search strategy to find practice guidelines
11
Number and types of studies
This should be the number that you found that studied both the same intervention and outcome since these are the “keeper” studies. Note: this number may be more then you actually end up critiquing.
12
Level of evidence of studies found
See page 11 in the textbook
13
Evidence Summary
Give author (s) date of research article
Study design:
Sample size:
Sample characteristics:
Setting:
Intervention studied:
Outcome studied:
Measurement of outcome:
Study findings:
Strength/quality of study:
Level of evidence:
Quantitative research individual study critical analysis
Name of group member who did critique: _________________________
Give the permalink for the article you are analyzing in space below:
Is there a comparison? (yes or no):
If there is a comparison what is it? (put N/A if there is no comparison)
If there is a comparison is it the same as you noted for the comparison above? (yes/no or N/A):
What is the study question(s) or hypotheses? (Use a direct quote. If neither of these are not stated put not stated)
Is the design appropriate for testing an intervention? (yes or no)
Is the setting similar to your setting/population of interest? (yes or no)
What was/were the sampling inclusion criteria?
What was/were the sampling exclusion criteria?
 
“Wre the subjects randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups?” (Melynk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015, p. 118)
(enter yes or no – note: if this is no then the study is not as strong and it is not a randomized controlled trial)
If the subjects were randomly assigned “was random assignment concealed from the individuals who were first enrolling subjects into the study?” (Melynk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015, p. 118)
(yes or no)
“Were the subjects and providers kept blind to study group?” (Melynk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015, p. 118)
yes or no – also note this is the blinding and an randomized controlled trial is strong but it is very strong if it is double blinded)
 
“Were reasons given to explain why subject did not complete the study?” (Melynk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015, p. 118)
(yes or no)
“Were the subjects analyzed in the group to which they were … assigned?” (Melynk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015, p. 118) pt yes or no
“Was the control group appropriate?” (Melynk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015, p. 118)
Put yes or no
 
“Were the subjects in each of the groups similar on demographic and baseline clinical variables?” (Melynk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015, p. 118)
Put yes or no
Did the researcher use power analysis to determine the appropriate sample size?
Put yes or no
 
Is the same size adequate?
Put yes, no, or unknown)
Are you convinced that everyone received the same intervention?
Yes or no – explain why or why not
“Were the follow-up assessments conducted long enough to fully study the effects of the intervention?” (Melynk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015, p. 118)
Yes or no – explain why or why no
After reading how the outcome was measured do you think this is the same as your O in your PICO question?
Yes or no and explain
What type of validity was used to make sure that the measurement tool really measured what it was intended to measure? (put an X next to all that apply below)
 
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Originally posted 2020-07-10 11:07:08.

· Analysis of necessary levels of risk vs. excessive risk.

Financial Risk and Required Return
Conduct some additional research on risk aversion within healthcare. In this research-based paper, analyze what the literature presents as an acceptable level of risk within the healthcare organization.
· Introduction (short)
· Application of the Capital Asset Pricing Model.
· Analysis of necessary levels of risk needed in order to maintain a level of profitability.
· Analysis of necessary levels of risk vs. excessive risk.
· Analysis of cost/benefit levels of risk to patients vs. production of large returns to the organization.
· Conclusion (short)
Your final submission will be 2-3 pages in length excluding the cover and reference pages. Be sure to include:
· Analysis of the acceptable level of risk.
· Summary of findings.
Your paper should meet the following structural requirements:
· The paper should be 3 pages in length, not including the cover sheet and reference page.
· The paper should be formatted according to APA
· Provide support for your financial statements with in-text citations from a minimum of seven scholarly articles.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Explain in detail the ethical issue of each case.

 

Module 1 – Case

INTRODUCTION TO ETHICAL AND LEGAL PERSPECTIVES IN HEALTHCARE

Assignment Overview

As a healthcare professional, it is your responsibility to be ethically sound. You have an essential responsibility to effectively apply ethical reasoning to crucial decisions. One method of elevating your ethical reasoning abilities is through the practice, reading, and understanding of case studies. While every case is not identical, the review of ethical case studies prepares you for similar incidents that may arise.

Case Assignment

For the Module 1 Case Assignment, you are to review 2 cases from the AMA Journal of Ethics (http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/site/cases.html).
In a 3-page paper complete the following:

  1. Identify each case that you have selected.
  2. Explain in detail the ethical issue of each case.
  3. Identify the ethical principle(s) that have been violated in the cases.
  4. Explain from a healthcare professional perspective, what you would have done differently in the case.

You are to support your analysis and views with at least 3 scholarly references (e.g., peer-reviewed journals).

Assignment Expectations

  1. Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your analysis.
  2. Limit your response to a maximum of 3 pages.
  3. Support your proposal with peer-reviewed articles, with at least 3 references. Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals: http://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php
  4. You may use the following source to assist in your formatting your assignment: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.