Coercive Treatment Essay

Attached below is a description of the assignment. Also, attached is the rubric. Please follow all directions within the rubric as well as the guidelines within the description.

Coercive Treatment Essay  

In 500-750 words, do the following:

1. Define coercive treatment in your own words.

2. Analyze whether coercive treatment in a correctional setting as an effective means of altering criminal behavior.

3. Assess other options to alter criminal behavior in the correctional community setting.

Provide three to five peer reviewed resources to support your explanations.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
PSY-623 PSY-623-O500 Coercive Treatment Essay 80.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 70.0%
Define coercive treatment in own words. 20.0% Definition of coercive treatment in student’s own words is missing. Definition of coercive treatment in student’s own words is vague and inconsistent. Definition of coercive treatment in student’s own words is present and clear. Definition of coercive treatment in student’s own words is clear and makes some connections to research. Definition of coercive treatment in student’s own words is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.
Analyze whether coercive treatment in a correctional setting as an effective means of altering criminal behavior. 25.0% Analysis of whether coercive treatment in a correctional setting as an effective means of altering criminal behavior is missing. Analysis of whether coercive treatment in a correctional setting as an effective means of altering criminal behavior is vague and inconsistent. Analysis of whether coercive treatment in a correctional setting as an effective means of altering criminal behavior is present and clear. Analysis of whether coercive treatment in a correctional setting as an effective means of altering criminal behavior is clear and makes some connections to research. Analysis of whether coercive treatment in a correctional setting as an effective means of altering criminal behavior is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.
Assess other options to alter criminal behavior in the correctional community setting. 25.0% Assessment of other options to alter criminal behavior in the correctional community setting is missing. Assessment of other options to alter criminal behavior in the correctional community setting is vague and inconsistent. Assessment of other options to alter criminal behavior in the correctional community setting is present and clear. Assessment of other options to alter criminal behavior in the correctional community setting is clear and makes some connections to research. Assessment of other options to alter criminal behavior in the correctional community setting is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.